The Answer is Segregation

By Nicholas Stix

During much of the 16th century in Western Europe, the Protestant Reformation arose. In response, cobblestone streets and dirt roads alike ran red with the blood of Protestants, then Catholics, too.

The finest minds in Europe got together, and eventually agreed that there was only one solution: Segregation. Catholics would live in certain areas, with Protestants in other areas.

Western nations are today again in the grip of civil wars that could be solved through segregation, but try and say this publicly, and one will be ruined, tarred with epithets such as “white supremacist,” “neo-Nazi,” etc.

One’s arguments will not get a hearing from the people dominating public opinion, who demand ever more “diversity,” ever fewer whites, and ever greater economic dispossession and political disenfranchisement of whites. That’s public opinion, not public discourse, mind you, because public discourse has not existed for generations in Western countries.

Integrationists used to promise all sorts of utopian goals: Social harmony, an improvement in black children’s test scores, a loss of white children’s arrogance, even cheaper health care.

Now, they no longer promise utopia, but threaten genocidal bloodshed if whites oppose their violent takeover, while occasionally publicly promising (and doing so much more frequently in private) the same bloodshed, when they take over. Meanwhile, the integrationists demand the importation solely of peoples who are completely unintegratable, and the rejection of all peoples who could be integrated.

The utopian promises were all lies. Integrationism was always a communist plot to destroy whites, and turn their countries into genocidal, communist dictatorships.

Integrationism brings with it no social benefits. It was never meant to.

And so, Western countries are now either going to have to expel entire demographic groups (including but not limited to Moslems), or find themselves embroiled in civil wars that will hearken back to the 16th century, but with bloodshed on a par with World War II, if not worse. Alternatively, whites and the civilization they built will be quietly marched to the charnel house.

Postscript: My good friend Mark Potok, then of the SPLC, unwittingly helped me think through this problem. Back in 2005, Mark asserted that I had used the arguments in Ian Jobling’s report, “The Color of Crime,” to argue for racial segregation. At that point, I had never argued for segregation. Indeed, I’d been raised an ardent integrationist, and had argued for integration as a teenager, and as a man during the early 1990s. Mark’s libel was intended variously to disgrace, and possibly to intimidate me. Instead, it provoked me to begin thinking, for the first time in my life, about integration.