PayPal

Monday, September 28, 2009

Why America Survived the Great Depression, and Why She Won’t Survive This One

By Nicholas Stix

I just dug up a March 21 letter to a friend and colleague, from which I have excerpted the following passage verebatin.


A more immediate issue is the economy. We survived Great Depression I because: 1. In spite of mass immigration, in 1933 America's culture and core morality were intact. Not as strong as in 1789 or 1833, to be sure, but Americanization had been forced on the immigrant waves, and they were almost all Europeans (and the Asians were high IQ, hard-working, and limited); 2. America's industrial plant was intact; 3. FDR did not succeed in taking over the entire economy; and 4. After we destroyed the industrial plants of the Gerries and the Japs, who had themselves destroyed much of other countries' industrial plants, the whole world had no choice but to buy our products.

Not one of the above four points obtains today. And while FDR sought dictatorial power, unlike the John Doe calling himself “Barack Obama,” he did not deliberately seek to destroy the American economy.

What to do? We must stop Obama on every front. No compromise, no surrender. Americans must act as though our very lives depended on stopping this aspiring dictator… because they do.

Sunday, September 27, 2009

The War on the Police

By Nicholas Stix

Middle American News
December, 2002

Terrorism is not confined to foreigners who murder Americans abroad, hijack airliners and crash them into American skyscrapers, or send anthrax-laced letters through the U.S. Postal Service. Likewise, terrorism's supporters are not limited to foreign leaders and the U.N. Terrorism lives on the streets of America's cities, and is robustly supported by American activists, elected officials, and by the mainstream, American media. The main form such domestic terrorism takes, is a war on the law-abiding populace by criminals. The supporters of such terror, have focused their efforts on handcuffing white, urban police officers, so that urban terrorists may have license to rape, rob, maim and kill.

The war on America's white urban police began in the 1960s, with the claim by the New Left -- which combined communism and racism, and is now known as "multiculturalism" -- that the police were an "occupying army" in the nation's urban slums, as if such neighborhoods were foreign nations. The war on the police really took off, however, in the late 1990s, with the advent of the racial profiling hoax, whose supporters insist that police officers arbitrarily harass, arrest, and even murder black boys and men, based solely on the color of their skin.

The War on the Police works on four levels: By denying white police the right to use physical force to subdue or detain black males, or to defend themselves against physical assault, even to save their own lives; by demanding that all police interrogations be videotaped, so as to highlight tactics that police are legally permitted to use in questioning suspects that urban blacks dislike, and will use as a pretext for acquitting the guilty; via jury nullification, in which jurors ignore good police work and instead set brutal criminals free; and through the movement to get all convictions of violent black criminals thrown out.
 
 
Handcuffed Police

The most high-profile current case of a handcuffed, white police officer is that of Inglewood, California Officer Jeremy Morse. In a much-played, July 6 video, in which Officer Morse throws 16-year-old suspect Donovan Jackson onto a car's closed trunk, Morse is seen to be bleeding from wounds inflicted by Jackson, and Morse claims that he punched Jackson only because the latter had squeezed the officer's testicles. According to Los Angeles Times columnist Steve Lopez, however, Officer Morse did not have a right to strike Jackson, even in self-defense. And as Morse's criminal defense attorney, John Barnett, told Middle American News, although Jackson insists that he was assaulted by Hispanic, black, and Middle-Eastern police colleagues of Morse, the City of Inglewood has singled out the white officer, Morse, for prosecution.

The movement to handcuff white police officers gained momentum with the 1991 Rodney King case. Following a protracted, high-speed chase, unlike passengers in King's car, who cooperated with police, the severely inebriated King resisted arrest. In attempting to subdue King, LAPD officers beat him with their batons, as they were trained to do. A bystander filmed the struggle on videotape. In showing the tape thousands of times, however, TV news programs always edited out the beginning, when King violently resisted arrest. The officers were tried for assault and other charges, acquitted, and Los Angeles blacks responded with 20th century America's most violent urban riots: 54 dead, over 2,000 wounded, and billions of dollars in property damage.

The Justice Department responded to the riots by subjecting the LAPD officers to the double-jeopardy of a federal "civil rights" trial, in which they were duly convicted. Police all over the country got the message: Black suspects were to be treated with kid gloves. The new dispensation emboldened violent, black criminals and their supporters.

In April, 2001, Cincinnati police Officer Steven Roach shot fleeing black suspect, Timothy Thomas. Thomas was wanted on 14 misdemeanor warrants, and a had a history of running from police. Officer Roach, who had an exemplary record, thought he saw the fleeing Thomas reach for a weapon. Fueled by media reports that implied that white policemen were murdering black men (almost all of whom were violent felons who had attacked, and even murdered police), and black community leaders who called for violence, black Cincinnatians responded with several days of riots. As Cincinnati's criminal class saw the police back down, there ensued an explosion of violence lasting weeks. Officer Roach was thrown to the mob, and indicted for manslaughter. He was acquitted at trial.
 
 
Videotaping Interrogations

On September 24, the lawyers and supporters of the five men who were convicted for the 1989 Central Park Jogger attack demanded that all police interrogations henceforth be videotaped. In a lengthy report the next day, amid repeated claims that innocent people routinely confess to crimes they did not commit, ABC-TV News reporter Geraldine Sealey argued for videotaping all police interrogations as an item of criminal justice reform. Oddly, Sealey never once mentioned the demand by the lawyers of the Jogger's attackers. The timing of the demand and Sealey's article reeked of collusion.

In 1989, the five attackers, then teenagers, confessed in their parents' presence, incriminating themselves and each other. (The attackers also confessed to many additional assaults from the same night, for which they were never tried.) The convicted attackers' lawyers insist that the confessions were coerced, while their media shills insinuate that there is no such thing as an uncoerced confession.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that police may legally use cunning and deception in interrogating suspects. Police may lie to suspects, telling them that they possess evidence incriminating the suspects, or that witnesses or accomplices have made statements incriminating them. The demand that all interrogations be videotaped, is based on the knowledge that many jurors -- especially urban blacks -- will find such practices repugnant, and use them as a pretext for acquitting guilty defendants.

A videotaping requirement would also bog down manpower and money in the procuring, taping, cataloguing and storing of videotapes, and cause detectives to censor themselves during interrogations, thus compromising their effectiveness. As one prosecutor said, videotaping would make it impossible to get convictions via confessions -- which is the point.

Further, amid specious claims of "coerced confessions," the requirement that all future interrogations be videotaped would be used, ex post facto, to re-open the cases of the justly convicted, in order to get new trials with suppressed confessions, which would lead to many of America's most vicious criminals being released to rape and murder again.
 
 
Jury Nullification

Increasing numbers of black jurors refuse to convict black suspects, even absent a confession, and no matter how much incriminating evidence weighs against them. The most notorious such cases are those of Lemrick Nelson Jr. and O.J. Simpson.

In 1991, amid calls by a black mob to "Kill the Jew!" a black male stabbed orthodox Jewish scholar Yankel Rosenbaum in Crown Heights, Brooklyn. Before Rosenbaum died, he pointed out Lemrick Nelson Jr. as his assailant, demanding of him, "Why did you do this to me?" The murder weapon was found in Nelson's pocket, drenched in Rosenbaum's blood. Nevertheless, in 1992, a racist, black and Hispanic Brooklyn jury acquitted Nelson -- and then went out to celebrate with the defendant and his attorney.

In the O.J. Simpson case, Simpson's ex-wife, Nicole, and her friend, Ron Goldman, were butchered with a knife in 1994. Blood evidence linking O.J. Simpson to the crime was found on his socks and SUV, and Simpson had no alibi for the time of the murder (actually, he gave three different, ever-changing alibis). No matter. In 1995, a predominantly black Los Angeles jury acquitted Simpson on all counts.
 
 
Overturning Convictions

The attempt to have the convictions of five of the men who attacked the Central Park Jogger overturned, is an outgrowth of a movement that goes back at least to the 1970s.

During the 1970s, former boxer Rubin "Hurricane" Carter and John Artis were tried and convicted, retried, and convicted yet again for three 1966 racial revenge murders in a Paterson, New Jersey bar. Overwhelming evidence against Carter and Artis, however, did not dissuade a movement uniting Hollywood socialists and black supremacists, who fought to have the men freed. And in 1985, federal district Judge Lee Sarokin obliged them. In an act of egregious judicial misconduct, Sarokin vacated the convictions against the two men. In his decision, Sarokin ignored the evidence, made factual claims that were clearly contradicted by the trial transcripts, and violated legal procedure by insisting that the prosecutor had engaged in misconduct in claiming that the men had engaged in racial revenge murders, even though at least one witness said that the killings were out of racial revenge, and Artis admitted that Carter had spoken of "shaking" (racial retaliation murder). Sarokin was so intent on freeing Carter and Artis, evidence and juries be damned, that he was willing to grasp at any legal or illegal straw to get his wish.

While the movement to handcuff police was meant to harm white law enforcement officers, in conjunction with the demand that black slums be patrolled by black officers, it has resulted in the murder and wounding of black officers. Thus, the war against white police officers is, ultimately, a war on all police officers. And since when you handcuff the police, people die, this war ultimately targets law-abiding citizens of all colors.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

More Moronic, Racist Letters from a Longtime Black Reader

By Nicholas Stix

In the wee small hours of August 27, I received and responded to an idiotic, racist letter by longtime reader, Brenda J. Verner, and published the correspondence. I responded to Verner’s e-mail with mockery and attempts at humor, but failed to make much of an impression on her.

That wasn’t the first moronic, racist letter Verner had sent me; unfortunately, I never got around to responding to and publishing an earlier one(s?), which I seem to have lost in the interim.

Well, Verner was just getting started. She sent me two more letters that day, which I have reprinted below verbatim.

So that the reader might get the full flavor of Verner’s racist bombast (and lack of paragraphing!), after publishing the first, longer letter in toto, I have quoted and responded to excerpts.



In a message dated 8/27/2009 10:18:46 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, bjverner writes:

I don't know how old you are, but you are obviously ignorant, uneducated, or intentionally deluding yourself with selective amnesia. Lynching of black people was a common community activity in America until the 1980's. Still in 1974, while I was at Harvard University, my 18 year old cousin was lynched, yes by whites. My great grandfather was lynched by the klan, over a basket of laundry. It is estimated that at least 117,000 black people have been lynched since the
founding of this nation. The pervasiveness of lynchings in the south, instigated The Great Migration. This was a communal sport all over the nation. The kids were brought out to see black men castrated, burned alive,skinned alive, tarred and feathered, their tongues cut out.(Google Lynching images to see a taste of this all American blood sport for yourself.) Black women were not exempt. In colonial times they even lynched pregnant and cut the babies out their stomachs as beat them to death. Ida B. Well, in the 1920's started the newspaper The Red Tide to record the backgrounds of the victims, the towns that proudly participated, and to appeal to the government to stop this routine form of terrorism that was used to "keep niggers in line." It was the lynching of Emmett Till that sparked the already smoldering civil rights movement. This does not include the "legal" acts of cops who have routinely shot down thousands of innocent black boys and men from plantation times to the present. Black Americans throughout this nation's history has witnessed newspaper accounts of hundreds of trials of white murders of black people, where the white jury routinely let the white offender go, no matter how heavy the evidence against the white defendants. "To Kill A Mockingbird" was one of the literary accounts pertaining to this type of issue. The forced prostitution, rape and murder of black girls and women has been a white privilege from slavery. These issues plus the egregious "legal" disenfranchisement and stripping of black people of hundreds of thousands of acres of their land was/is the source of the much examined concept of "Black Rage"(read the book). It was just a fact of life that Black people in America lived in a state of perpetual fear of whites until relatively recently. In my childhood, I experienced many occasions of whites physically assaulting me and or my friends or other black strangers, out of the blue. The very sight of us, mind you children, would send them into life-threatening rock attacks. As an adult, I have been physically attacked by virtual white strangers in Boston and Cambridge. Once when I was a teenager, I saw a white man hit a black woman with a metal lunch pail because she sat down in a seat on the bus that he wanted - this was in Chicago. Who has perpetrated more violence than black Americans? - white Americans my man, white Americans.

Excerpts and Replies (Verner’s statements are in quotes)
________________________________________
“I don't know how old you are, but you are obviously ignorant, uneducated, or intentionally deluding yourself with selective amnesia. Lynching of black people was a common community activity in America until the 1980's.”

You lie!

“Still in 1974, while I was at Harvard University, my 18 year old cousin was lynched, yes by whites.”

Provide a name, date, and location, and I’ll check it out. Otherwise, I’ll have to assume, based on your track record, that you are lying again.

“My great grandfather was lynched by the klan, over a basket of laundry.”

Name, date, location.

“It is estimated that at least 117,000 black people have been lynched since the founding of this nation.”

You lie!

(See the section after these letters on lynchings.)


“The pervasiveness of lynchings in the south, instigated The Great Migration.”

The Great Migration was about economics, not lynchings. Otherwise, it would have begun ca. 1890, rather than during World War I. You lie!

“In colonial times they even lynched pregnant [sic] and cut the babies out their stomachs as [sic] beat them to death.”

Prove it, or be condemned as a liar.

“It was the lynching of Emmett Till that sparked the already smoldering civil rights movement.”

Brown vs. Board of Education preceded the lynching of Emmett Till by a year, the Jackie Robinson case by another ten years, and the founding of the NAACP by yet 35 years more. The Niagara Movement was still older.

Speaking of lynchings and civil rights, when do whites get some redress for the thousands of ever more gruesome black lynchings of whites? When do we get our civil rights movement?

DOJ stats on interracial murders, 1976-2005.


“This does not include the ‘legal’ acts of cops who have routinely shot down thousands of innocent black boys and men from plantation times to the present.”

Prove it, or be condemned as a liar.

“Black Americans throughout this nation's history has witnessed newspaper accounts of hundreds of trials of white murders of black people, where the white jury routinely let the white offender go, no matter how heavy the evidence against the white defendants. ‘To Kill A Mockingbird’ was one of the literary accounts pertaining to this type of issue.”

You lie! To Kill a Mockingbird was inspired by the Scottsboro Boys case. If you’re going to lie, can’t you at least put some skill and effort into it?

“The forced prostitution, rape and murder of black girls and women has been a white privilege from slavery.”

You lie! This particular lie has been so frequently and widely broadcast that until recently, even I assumed it was true. Rather, “the forced prostitution, rape and murder of black girls and women” has been a privilege of black men since time immemorial. Although I have encountered many black females whom I considered beautiful and desirable, and dated quite a few in my youth (I dated many women from each main racial group—I’m no great lover, but I love women), the historical fact of the matter is that going back to slave days, few white men have found any black women attractive. There is a certain symmetry between white men and black women: Most black women find white men unattractive.

However, historically in America there has been a much different relation between black men and white women. While some white women have always been attracted to some black men, most black men have long been sexually obsessed with white women, regardless of one's desirability or beauty.


“These issues plus the egregious ‘legal’ disenfranchisement and stripping of black people of hundreds of thousands of acres of their land was/is the source of the much examined concept of "Black Rage"(read the book).”

Prove it. “Black Rage” is b.s., so don’t try and use one hoax to sell another one.
As for the rest of your charges, you’ve set off my b.s. meter so many times, that due to your complete lack of credibility, if you were to accidentally tell the truth, I would have to assume you were lying yet again. Like most blacks, you have a history of crying wolf.

Three hours later on the same day, Verner sent me the following e-mail.


In a message dated 8/27/2009 1:18:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, bjverner writes:
Please do not publish my first or second response to your post.
They were for your consumption only.

Here’s how it works, Brenda. If you don’t want me publishing your racist, dishonest e-mails, don’t send them. But if you send them, I will publish them. Slavery was abolished 144 years ago, and you are not my owner.


On Lynching

The following section is from Michael Keene, who says that it is based on statistics collected by the Tuskegee Institute, a black organization that would hardly be interested in low-balling lynching statistics. I could not find any direct link to Tuskegee, and the other blogs and Web sites I found combined amateurishness with pc. Though I can’t vouch for their precision, the statistics that Keene cites sound like the ones I’m used to reading.

Lynching in America
Lynching Statistics, by Race, State and Year:

*From 1882 to 1964, there were 4,742 documented cases of lynchings in America.

*Of these cases, 3,445 blacks and 1,297 whites were victimes of lynching.

*The vast proponderous of lynching cases occurred from 1882 to 1935

*The year which saw the most number of lynchings was 1892 with 230

*From 1882 to 1885 more whites were lynched than blacks 315 to 227

*By the 1950's lynching had all but disappeared

*Mississippi, Texas, Georgia, Louisiana and Alabama saw the most instances of lynching, accounting for 50 percent of all cases.

*Arizona, California, Colorado,Idaho, Indiana, Iowa,KansasMichigan, Minnesota,Montana, Nebraska,Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming, had more cases of whites lynched than blacks

Source:

Tuskegee Institute

(The only scholarly article I could find on the phenomenon was “Rough Justice: Was lynching a scandal or a system of justice or both?,” a review of Dwight Murphey’s monograph, Lynching — History and Analysis, by Thomas Jackson, in American Renaissance. As Murphey and Jackson emphasize, blacks were not typically randomly lynched, nor were whites. The vast majority of lynchees were criminal suspects, and a large though indeterminate percentage of both groups (white and black) was guilty as hell, and got what was coming to them under the justice of the time, which was not necessarily inferior to what passes for criminal justice today. Criminal justice has always been a brutal business; pick your poison.
Other postings may pretend to scholarly rigor, but prove to be racial socialist propaganda, like the two linked below:

“Lynching in America: Carnival of Death,” by Mark Gado, in TruTV’s Crime Library, and

“Lynching”: Information from Answers.com.)

Friday, September 25, 2009

Teaching Young New Jersey School Children to Honor the Führer

By Nicholas Stix



A friend sent this along yesterday, with the following note,

“Should be familiar to all those who went to kindergarten and school in the mid-80s or earlier. Kinda like a punch in the nose when you realize that this is the United States and not Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany.”

The video was put together with the montage and music by Brain Dead Republican, who tells us that the "video was made of a school teacher having children sing praises to Barack Hussein Obama. June 19, 2009 at the B. Bernice Young Elementary School in Burlington, NJ."

Brain Dead Republican has some other excellent material exposing the indoctrination of school children as young as seven by racial socialist teachers and principals supporting the John Doe calling himself “Barack Obama,” going back to well before the election.

Although the teacher leading the indoctrination at B. Bernice Young Elementary School is not visible, she can be heard in the background, and is black—surprise, surprise. The words are the clunkiest attempt I’ve yet heard to highjack “The Battle Hymn of the Republic” which, when you think about it, is pretty clunky, to begin with, and was similarly used to deify Lincoln.

The Boss tells me that the video has since hit Fox News, but you can be sure that the leftwing nets and CNN will suppress it. She recounts that the black teacher says that she went to school with “Obama,” but what does that have to do with the price of tea in China? (Indeed, you could ask the same question of every non sequitur spouting from the mouths of black racists and their white racist “allies.”)

The Boss asks, “If they can’t praise God, how can they praise a idol?”

Actually, public school children are permitted to praise "God," as long as it is the moon god.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Material on the Knoxville Horror

(The Kidnapping-Gang-Rapes-Torture-Murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom)
By Nicholas Stix

(Last updated at 10:34 p.m., on Saturday, October 3, 2009.)

Unless stated otherwise, all material was written by yours truly. Since local media outlets have variously published and broadcast over 1000 stories on this case, I do not pretend to be offering the reader a complete list, although I could probably compile a list of all of the KH stories from national media organs in less than an hour.

“The Knoxville Horror: The Crime and the Cover-Up,” American Renaissance, May 14, 2007.

“Shame on You, Michelle Malkin! A Republican Diva, Journalistic Ethics, and the Knoxville Horror,” May 17, 2007, Nicholas Stix, Uncensored (hereafter, “NSU”).

“Another Michelle Malkin Stooge Gets the Knoxville Horror Story Wrong,” May 18, 2007, NSU.

“Knoxville Horror Trial Dates Set for One Year from Now; MSM ‘Discovers’ Four-Month-Old Case,” May 19, 2007, NSU.

“Undercover Black Man: Svengali Media of Knoxville Horror Notoriety a ‘Hoax Site,’” May 20, 2007, NSU.

“Knoxville Horror: Trial Dates Set; MSM ‘Discovers’ Case; Bloggers Continue Spreading Rumors,” May 21, 2007, NSU.

“Credbility SUNsets: Dave Lucas, the New York Sun, and the Knoxville Horror,” May 25, 2007, NSU.

“The Knoxville Horror: The crime and the media blackout,” July 2007, American Renaissance.

“Hunting Fugitives is No Job for Tommy Lee Jones: An Interview with Chief Deputy U.S. Marshal Rich Knighten,” July 6, 2007, NSU.

“The White Supremacist, the Jew, and the Knoxville Horror,” October 26, 2007, NSU:

Alex Linder Interview Transcript I, April 6, 2007;

Alex Linder Interview Transcript II, June 7, 2007;

Alex Linder Interview III Transcript, June 27, 2007.

“The Knoxville Horror: Crime, Race, the Media, and ‘Anti-Racism,’” October 31, 2007, VDARE.

“White Supremacy and Plagiarism at CNN,” January 18, 2008, NSU.

“The Knoxville Horror Never Happened, and There are No Marxists, Says Reader,” January 19, 2008, NSU.

“The First Knoxville Horror Trial: The Accessory and the Girlfriend,” May 14, 2008, VDARE.

“Channon Christian’s Ordeal: Knoxville Horror Torture Testimony,” May 15, 2008, VDARE.

“De-Policing and the Knoxville Horror,” May 17, 2008, VDARE.

“Justice Delayed In Knoxville–but Why?,” May 30, 2008, VDARE.

“Conclusion of First Knoxville Horror Trial Shows Legal System Under Stress,” October 25, 2008, VDARE.

“Knoxville Horror Prosecutions Spinning Out of Control?,” March 28, 2009, VDARE.

“Letalvis Cobbins Convicted of 33 Charges, Including First Degree Murder, Aggravated Rape, in First Knoxville Horror Murder Trial,” August 26, 2009, NSU.

“Longtime Black Reader Disagrees with My Blog on the Conviction of Knoxville Horror Rapist-Murderer Letalvis Cobbins,” August 27, 2009, NSU.

“In First Knoxville Horror Murder Trial, Racist Black Jurors and Devious White Judge Spare Letalvis Cobbins,” August 29, 2009, NSU.

“Diversity is Strength! It’s also…Minority Jury Nullification,” VDARE, October 1, 2009. (Cobbins Trial.)

The Knoxville News Sentinel’s KH Archive.

Documents, Interrogation Videos, and Transcripts

Monday, September 21, 2009

New York News Anchor Ernie Anastos: Did He or Didn't He?

By Nicholas Stix

Various Web outlets have charged New York Fox 5 News anchor Ernie Anastos with having used a four-letter word during the September 16, 10 p.m. broadcast. Watch the Youtube video excerpt below, and let me know: What do you think?

Friday, September 18, 2009

Happy New Year!

A gut Jahr!

With best wishes,

Nicholas Stix

APB: Calling All Cars! Find Blogger Latte Island Immediately!

By Nicholas Stix

I just tried to access one of my favorite blogs, Latte Island, and got the following Google message:


This blog is
 

open to invited
 

readers only 



http://latteisland.blogspot.com/

It doesn't look like you have been invited to read this blog. If you think this is a mistake, you might want to contact the blog author and request an invitation….


When a blogger goes private, it usually follows some sort of harassment.

Here’s the rub: I never had an eddress for Latte; she never provided one.

I was able to access her recent work through September 13, via a Google cache, but Google caches last a few weeks, at most, before they vanish into the ether. So, if anyone is in contact with Latte, please have her get in touch with me!

Thursday, September 17, 2009

The Terrorist in the White House: “Obama,” Health Care, and 911

By Nicholas Stix

In his September 9 speech on health care “reform,” the John Doe calling himself “Barack Obama” asserted that his public health care plan wouldn’t cost the taxpayer a dime (i.e., wouldn’t cause the deficit to rise at all), yet he used as his models Medicare and public colleges.

But according to its own trustees, Medicare will go bankrupt in 2017, and the True Cost Blog calculates that 2015—with the estimated bankruptcy date moved up on a yearly basis—is presently a more realistic estimated date of bankruptcy.

Meanwhile, public colleges cost the taxpayers over $70 billion per year (state; federal aid numbers and enrollee numbers) in tuition aid, i.e., not counting capital and program funding, over and above what they bring in in tuition charges and fees.

Returning to Medicare, as the True Cost blog recently observed, “Medicare has limited funds, but nearly unlimited liabilities.” The blogger observes that the only way to forestall Medicare’s bankruptcy would be to severely ration care. But the denial that Obamacare would necessitate the rationing of health care is one of “Obama’s” favorite current health care policy lies.

True Cost predicts that by 2017, Medicare’s budget will look like California’s budget today, as hemorrhaging red ink necessitates draconian service cuts.

The only alternative is rationing, but “Obama” has denied that Obamacare would entail rationing. The only economic tradeoff he foresees is having to cut other parts of his budget, in case Obamacare loses money. But “Obama” has no practical conception of budget cutting. He has a conception of confiscating and spending productive people’s wealth through redistributing it to unproductive people, based in both cases on skin color. The only way he could cut expenses, would be by cutting services. But he will not cut services to blacks or Hispanics, especially not to black or Hispanic illegal aliens. Those are the people whom he considers his constituents.

Keep in mind that “Obama” has been presenting Medicare as the ideal towards which Obamacare strives.

“Obama” claims that Obamacare would be supported entirely based on recipients’ payments, but he plans on flooding the program with poor people, including as many as 28 million illegal alien invaders (including their American-born children, who are typically falsely referred to as “American citizens”) just for starters, who have never paid a doctor, and who have no intention of starting now.

“Obama” insisted that the program could be financed through savings from “eliminating waste and corruption,” but The Man from ACORN never met waste and corruption he didn’t like, as long as it benefited him and his “friends” (see “constituents”), and hurt his “enemies.” He has no track record of eliminating a nickel of “waste and corruption,” and indeed, during the greatest economic depression in this nation’s history, has elevated it from a practice costing the predominantly white tax base billions to one costing it trillions. He has gone so far as to earmark over one billion taxpayer dollars to the criminal organization calling itself “ACORN.”

“Obama” insisted that it was a “tall tale” that Obamacare would serve illegal aliens, but Democrats have twice shot down language proposed by Republican lawmakers that would require that every potential adult recipient prove that he was in the country legally, and that every legal immigrant prove that he had been in the country a certain minimum amount of time, which until now was standard practice for all means-tested federal programs, and while his belated agreement to deny treatment to illegals is an implicit admission that he was previously lying, the loopholes left in his proposal that will still permit illegals to get treatment show that he has never stopped lying, and never yielded an inch. “Compromise” with this man simply means that he wins through cheating and lying. “Obama” does not compromise.

The only sophistry that “Obama” could use to sidestep the collar of being a bald-faced liar would be to invoke his plan to amnesty all criminal foreign invaders—Obamacare would not benefit “illegals,” because they would cease to exist as such. But in the face of overwhelming public opposition (70 percent) to an amnesty, and even stiffer opposition (over 80 percent) to paying for the health care for illegal invaders, that’s the last thing he wants to acknowledge. His Obamacare sales strategy requires that he mislead the white taxpayer-citizen public on his plan to soak it, to pay for health care for illegal aliens, at the same time that he cuts elderly whites—you know, the group that paid at least 90 percent of the Medicare funds from their age cohort—from services.

All of “Obama’s” strenuous lying is necessitated by his racial socialist plan to make white citizen-taxpayers pay for his program, while slowly cutting them off from health care.

At present, as “Obama” connives to bring about a full-bore amnesty, he is implementing a stealth amnesty, by sabotaging immigration enforcement.
“Obama’s” robotic devotees will say that I’m insane. Why would he do such a thing, they will demand?

It’s the racism, stupid! The man worshiped a genocidal black supremacy whose entire “theology” is based on the idea that God is black, and will kill off the white race, “Every week. 11 oclock service,” in the same “church” for 20 years.

During those 20 years, “Obama’s” pastor was black supremacist Jeremiah Wright. When highlights were posted in spring 2008 from a sermon in which Wright ranted, among other charming outbursts, “Goddamn America,” when “Obama” wasn't lying and saying that he hadn't heart Wright speak in such a fashion, he was insisting that the outbursts were mere “snippets” taken out of context, as if there were some context in which Wright’s racist, traitorous rantings would be justified.

The context for Wright’s genocidal racism and traitorous anti-Americanism is that he is a devotee of James H. Cone, the genocidal racist, anti-American founder of Black Liberation Theology.

Cone teaches, for instance,
Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of a black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community.


Cone also demanded that whites submit to black domination, or be ready to fight a bloody civil war.

“Obama’s” ghostwritten autobiography is entitled, Dreams from My Father. “Obama’s” father deserted him and his mother when the son was only two years old, but the son’s racist white mother passed them down to him. The father recorded his dreams, which fit perfectly into the son’s world view of genocidal black supremacy, in his article, “Problems Facing Our Socialism.” In it, the father called on the black-run Kenyan government to seize all assets belonging to whites and Asians (Indians), and give them to blacks. He also suggested the desirability of a tax rate of 100 percent. The father acknowledged that his plan would not stimulate the Kenyan economy, but he didn’t care about that. Fortunately for the Kenyans, the government ignored the father. Unfortunately for us, the son has seized control of the American government.

Last week 911 rolled around, the day when we annually commemorate the worst terrorist attack on America in her history. And how did we commemorate it this year? With the Oval Office under occupation by a man whose true name and citizenship we don’t even know, who took a minute off to visit Ground Zero and give “volunteerism and remembrance” a bad name, before returning to his great work, of waging racial and economic terrorism on the historic American people.

Monday, September 14, 2009

The New York Times v. Joe Wilson

By Nicholas Stix

The New York Times has unleashed its intellectual heavy artillery on Cong. “Joe” Wilson, he of “You lied!” fame, for calling out the racist John Doe, alias “Barack Obama,” who broke into the White House, and who does not intend to ever leave it.

In “Parsing Mr. Wilson’s Apology,” New York Times columnist Gail Collins tries to give her take on the new and not-so new DNC talking points, plus a side of snark. Collins can be a witty writer when she is thinking for herself, but not so much when she is playing ventriloquist’s dummy.

I’d have been willing to bet that we had a national consensus on the undesirability of a congressman yelling out “You lie!” during an address by the president of the United States. But no. It turns out there are quite a few people who think this is a good idea.

Joe Wilson, who will be forever known as the “You lie!” congressman, unless he does something even weirder in the future, has a lot of fans this weekend at the Taxpayer March on Washington. This is an anti-Obama demonstration organized by FreedomWorks, the group that helped bring us the summer town hall meeting protests.

Those were, of course, the events where we learned that we did not actually have a national consensus on the inadvisability of bringing loaded weapons to places where the president is speaking.

Among the co-sponsors of the march are the Tea Party Patriots, who helped bring us those anti-tax rallies last spring, during which we learned that there are some patriots who love the country so much that they would like to see their state secede from the union.

And now they also love Joe Wilson. “People need to stop being afraid and not bite their tongues,” one of the marchers told the newspaper The Hill. Actually, fear of self-expression does not seem to be that big of a problem with this group, but Wilson undoubtedly appreciated all the supporters who honored him by yelling “Liar!” as often as possible.

The tea party movement activists range from geeky Ron Paulists who obsess about the money supply to conspiracy theorists who believe that Barack Obama is a noncitizen brought here by people who hate this country and had the foresight to plant a birth notice in a Hawaiian newspaper 48 years ago, just in case they ever needed it.
The one thing that unites them seems to be a sense of inchoate rage. Although mentioning it makes them really, really mad.


[Angry white males. Got it? That one is vintage 1994.]

“Perhaps that’s why they like Joe Wilson. (His actual name is Addison Graves Wilson Sr. Where do the Republicans find all these faux Joes?)”

This does not seem like a great excuse. Wouldn’t you rather admit it was a
plan than say you had so little self-control…

[This was the only fundamentally new DNC talking point: ‘Wilson had planned his outburst, all along.’ Unless one is an Obamaton, I’m not sure what the significance of this point is, and if one is an Obamaton, I’m not sure what its significance is, beyond saying, “Joe Wilson (place anything or its opposite in this blank), boo! Hiss!”]


Collins then lies about the health care bill,

Meanwhile, just to make sure nobody else ever goes off the rails like this again, the Senate Finance Committee is changing its version of the health care bill from one that does not provide benefits to illegal immigrants to one that absolutely, positively, for sure does not provide benefits to illegal immigrants.


[In recycling the DNC talking point from last spring, Collins sought to mock opponents of Doe/Obama, by linking them with Rush Limbaugh. That will surely cause all Rush Limbaugh fans in the DNC and on the Manhattan’s Upper West Side to die with shame.]

Over at the Taxpayers March, people wanted the Republicans to apologize for asking Wilson to apologize. They seemed to be taking a cue from Rush Limbaugh, who said he was “ecstatic” when Wilson yelled at the president, since he himself had been shrieking “liar” at his TV throughout the speech.

Tea Party Patriots, do you really want your members of Congress doing something just because Rush Limbaugh does it? The next thing you know, they’ll be abusing prescription drugs and comparing the Abu Ghraib tortures to a fraternity initiation.
Interestingly, very few of Wilson’s defenders have noted that in the British Parliament, members shout insults all the time.

Actually, Gail, Wilson’s defenders have noted just that. You lied…again.

Times plagiarist Maureen Dowd, the aging but still beautiful, spurned former lover of Michael Douglas, went Collins one better the next day. In “Boy, Oh, Boy,” Dowd, speaking of the “brainy black president,” exercised the nuclear option. (A tip 'o the hat to Larry Auster.)

The normally nonchalant Barack Obama looked nonplussed, as Nancy Pelosi glowered behind.

[That should be, “behind him,” Maureen.]

Surrounded by middle-aged white guys — a sepia snapshot of the days when such pols ran Washington like their own men’s club — Joe Wilson yelled “You lie!” at a president who didn’t.

[But of course Doe/Obama lied. And in denying that, you lied, Maureen.]

But, fair or not, what I heard was an unspoken word in the air: You lie, boy!...
I’ve been loath to admit that the shrieking lunacy of the summer — the frantic efforts to paint our first black president as the Other, a foreigner, socialist, fascist, Marxist, racist, Commie, Nazi; a cad who would snuff old people; a snake who would indoctrinate kids — had much to do with race.

I tended to agree with some Obama advisers that Democratic presidents typically have provoked a frothing response from paranoids — from Father Coughlin against F.D.R. to Joe McCarthy against Truman to the John Birchers against J.F.K. and the vast right-wing conspiracy against Bill Clinton.”


[Wow! She pulled out court historian Richard Hofstadter's chestnut, whereby all opponents of socialism/communism/whatever are "paranoid."]

But Wilson’s shocking disrespect for the office of the president — no Democrat ever shouted “liar” at W. when he was hawking a fake case for war in Iraq — convinced me: Some people just can’t believe a black man is president and will never accept it.

“A lot of these outbursts have to do with delegitimizing him as a president,” said Congressman Jim Clyburn, a senior member of the South Carolina delegation. Clyburn, the man who called out Bill Clinton on his racially tinged attacks on Obama in the primary, pushed Pelosi to pursue a formal resolution chastising Wilson.

“In South Carolina politics, I learned that the olive branch works very seldom,” he said. “You have to come at these things from a position of strength. My father used to say, ‘Son, always remember that silence gives consent.’ ”…


[If only John McCain had taken that lesson to heart!]

It may be President Obama’s very air of elegance and erudition that raises hackles in some. “My father used to say to me, ‘Boy, don’t get above your raising,’ ” Fowler said. “Some people are prejudiced anyway, and then they look at his education and mannerisms and get more angry at him.”

Clyburn had a warning for Obama advisers who want to forgive Wilson, ignore the ignorant outbursts and move on: “They’re going to have to develop ways in this White House to deal with things and not let them fester out there. Otherwise, they’ll see numbers moving in the wrong direction.”


Clyburn was one of the racist black politicians and operatives who engineered the “fairy tale” race hoax on the eve of last year’s South Carolina primary against Hillary Clinton, on behalf of Doe/“Obama,” that rhetorically handcuffed Clinton for the balance of the campaign, as her rival’s surrogates established the unwritten rule that any criticism of him, even by a Clinton, was “racist.” By repeating the hoax, Dowd is reinforcing it.

Of course, given some of the crimes Doe/“Obama’s” critics have charged him with, race-baiting may be the least of his sins.

Then again, the media elite have promoted the notion since at least 1963, that any criticism of blacks, or resistance to black or racial socialist rule is “racist.” The difference over the years has been in the media and black elites’ respective continual upping of the ante.

In “Obama’s Squandered Summer,” white Times drama queen Frank Rich shocked me by not playing the race card. Rich called the health care speech “(mildly) partisan,” and his only reference to Wilson was,

Indeed Obama instantly gained a foot or two in height Wednesday night once that South Carolina clown hollered “You lie!”

Rich called on Doe/“Obama” to rule more aggressively. More aggressively? What would that entail, televised executions on the White House lawn?

Attacking “white men,” and demanding that they commit political suicide is second nature to Rich, and was his sole strategy in seeking to get Doe/“Obama” elected last year. He will again play the race card.

* * *


I thought the DNC was done with Limbaugh, and had moved on to Glenn Beck.

While listening to the speech, I couldn’t make out what Wilson shouted, but I had already said “Liar” to my TV numerous times, and was far from done. What else are you supposed to call a liar?

Joe Wilson spoke for the over 100 million white Americans whose letters are suppressed by the racist media, e.g., the NYT, who have to endure racial socialist “diversity training” at work and in school, losing college admissions, jobs, anmd promotions to unqualified blacks and Hispanics, savage, racially-motivated black and Hispanic crime, and racist blacks, Hispanics, and whites who demand that they underwrite their own dispossession and disenfranchisement.

My only disappointment was that Wilson apologized to Doe/”Obama.”

* * *


It always drives me nuts when whites respond to racial attacks with, “This isn’t about race!” During the Duke Rape Hoax, whites who defended the three white victims of racist black hoaxer/prostitute Crystal Gail Mangum, continually would protest to the racist blacks supporting Mangum, “This isn’t about race!”

Of course, it was about race. It was about nothing but race.

Mangum and her fellow racists sought to railroad the three victims because they were white and innocent. Had they been black and guilty as hell, Mangum & Co. would have left them alone. John Doe/“Barack Obama” is a biracial racist who seeks to destroy white America. Gail Collins, Maureen Dowd, and Frank Rich are white racists who seek to destroy white America. Rich, in particular, is a leading figure of the New White Racism.

When are whites finally going to aggressively respond to racial attacks as racial attacks, instead of engaging in denial? When it is too late, and they have been reduced to minority status in their own country, and disenfranchised and dispossessed? When they are already bound and gagged and being anally gang-raped by a racist black attacker? When their killer’s first bullet rips into their back?

Friday, September 11, 2009

Is Robert Stacy McCain, Alias “The Other McCain,” an Anti-Semite?

By Nicholas Stix

It seems that (The Other) McCain made the mistake of weighing in on a conversation about why Jews remain overwhelmingly, resolutely socialist, er, “liberal,” and no one bothered to tell him, “This conversation is restricted.”

In case you’re wondering how the self-styled intellectual readers of leftwing blogs managed to make the jump from McCain’s suggestion that Jews move out to the country, so that their boys can grow up hotrodding down rural roads, to portraying him as Adolph McCain, they employ two intellectual methods: 1. They avoid reading people they consider their enemies; and 2. When they accidentally read a little bit of an "enemy," they respond with the same boilerplate as for 1., even if the boilerplate response is a total non sequitur. (All lefty "logic" is a series of non sequiturs.)

One of the scandals of contemporary public discourse, or the lack thereof, is the laziness, really aliteracy, and anti-intellectualism of college-indoctrinated lefties. (And not just lefties. Regarding neoconservative Jewish intellectuals, I have diagnosed the present age as one of Jewish mediocrity.) On a good day they go to one of their designated blogs, read a putdown of a Republican or conservative, and immediately vituperate, without ever bothering to read “the enemy’s” article. Lefty propagandists have long sought to quote the “wingnuts” out of context (they never have to do that with me, because I induce blunt force trauma in readers), but sometimes, they get the same reaction from their comrades by quoting perfectly innocuous passages in context. This vilification of anyone deviating a single degree from the racial socialist party line is a central facet of the long slow death of intellect that has been playing out in America for the past 46 years.
The following is the McCain passage that one lefty blogger saw as incriminating:

People tend to vote how they live and, despite the particular cultural differences that influence the politics of American Jews, I suspect that lifestyle has a lot to do with the persistence of liberalism in Jewish politics.
If Messrs. Podhorhetz, et al., wish to promote conservatism among American Jews, let them find some way to encourage Jewish families to move to small towns in the Heartland, where their kids can grow up hunting, fishing and hot-rodding the backroads.


Note that these are people who would like to see folks like T.O. McCain and yours truly imprisoned for “hate crimes,” shipped off to re-education camps, and tortured and murdered. They are projecting their own totalitarian impulses onto McCain, and using this scenario to divert attention from themselves.

Meanwhile, in their refusal to do their homework, the lefty vituperators have no idea what the original discussion, “Why are Jews Liberals?,” at Commentary, was about. McCain was responding to the truly inflammatory contribution by Michael Medved, who argued that most American Jews have replaced the religion of Judaism with that of “liberalism” (read: socialism), and that bigotry towards Christians keeps them in their present faith community. And Medved, as McCain observed, is right.

Elsewhere, T.O. McCain makes his only remark on the topic that I failed to grasp.

"No conservative white Christian is allowed to discuss ethnicity and culture."

For the record, I have never identified myself as a “conservative.”

Look for The Other McCain soon in the John Garfield role in a remake of Gentleman’s Agreement. Since I am tall, dark, handsome, and speak in a measured bass-baritone, I will re-create the Gregory Peck role.

A tip ‘o the hat to James Fulford.

Monday, September 07, 2009

Have You and Your Children Made Your Pledge to the Führer Yet?

By Nicholas Stix



Not everyone has.

In much of the country, school starts on Tuesday. Prepare your children, just in case, or keep them home. In America, we make pledges to the Constitution and to America, not to a Führer.

P.S. Don't forget: "Barack will make you work."

Madame Michelle

Ichiro Milestone: “Ugly Japanese” is First Player to Reach 2,000 Hits While Refusing to Learn English

By Nicholas Stix

“Japanese, Japanese, Japanese, Japanese, Japanese, Japanese, Japanese, Japanese, Japanese, Japanese.”

That was Seattle Mariners outfielder Ichiro Suzuki speaking, on the occasion of becoming the second-fastest player to notch his 2,000th base hit in big league history (1,402), after Hall of Famer Al Simmons (1,390)… through a translator.

Suzuki is at the tail-end of his ninth big league season, and has resolutely refused to learn English. Were this his first season, using a translator might be justifiable, but even that’s a dubious proposition. When you go to live and work in a foreign country, among the populace, particularly in a job in the public eye, learning the language is a simple matter of respect.

When I left home for West Germany in 1980, I killed myself to learn the language. In fact, after a year there, German students I had just met thought that I had been born elsewhere, but lived there almost my entire life. One year later, new acquaintances took me for a native-born German, albeit one who had been born in a different part of the country. (During visits to Munich during my fifth year, I had the disconcerting experience of having Bavarians ask me if were a Swiss or an Austrian, disconcerting because the only people that speak worse German than Austrians are the Swiss!)

Some people will say, “Well, of course, you went there to study.”

There was nothing obvious about it. Lots of American and other foreign students who had taken years of German classes at home also went there, but they typically knew only a smattering of German when they arrived, didn’t bother themselves to learn more, and returned home knowing only perhaps a few more phrases than when they had arrived. (They didn’t study, but got credits, as if they had.)

Of course, we have no lack of ugly foreigners, most of them Hispanics, and some “Ugly Americans” – players like overpaid Mets underachiever, Oliver Perez, who were born American citizens in Puerto Rico, but who have refused to learn more than pidgin English.

In a different and better time, when more Americans had self-respect, fans would have booed Suzuki and other players refusing to learn English off the field, and/or boycotted them. Today, all we hear about is the fans embracing him and those like him, in spite of their obvious contempt for the nation that makes them rich as Croesus.

Such players are supported in their contempt by the media’s idolatry. A breathless Jane Lee, writing for MLB.com, gushes, using Mariners manager Don Wakamatsu as mouthpiece, that Suzuki is the greatest player in the history of the game.

OAKLAND -- Don Wakamatsu has no problem saying Ichiro Suzuki may be the best to ever play the game.
If he's not yet, the Mariners skipper believes he's well on his way.
The non-believers may argue he's too small in stature, but others will say he exudes a larger-than-life presence unique to today's game.
The non-believers may mock his 170-pound body, but others will remind them that the real weight he carries is a much heavier legacy that will be remembered for generations to come.
Nearing age 36, Ichiro still plays the game like a wide-eyed rookie with nothing to lose and everything to gain. He's a Japanese phenom turned American idol, and despite the never-ending list of differences between him and players those non-believers may deem the greatest hitters of all-time, Ichiro will easily squeeze his 170 pounds into that elite class….


Of course, he's the greatest: He's non-white, non-American, and he holds America in contempt. He's a walking hat trick! The only thing better would be if he were "transexual." Right, Jane?

Lee raves, as well, about “the ever-modest Ichiro.” If he’s so modest, he can learn English!

Wednesday, September 02, 2009

Anchor Babies are Now Setting Sail … from Trinidad

By Nicholas Stix

People have long associated anchor babies with Mexico, but that association is obsolete. Get ready for anchor babies from around the world. Ah, the joys of diversity!

And those births will be greeted by the obligatory emotional, celebratory news stories from OBL traitor-reporters.

Even in Trinidad, people know all about the anchor baby scam. While we were there for 20 days in late July through mid-August on our annual visit to my wife’s family, two separate Indian couples informed my wife that they planned on going to the U.S. to have their babies. One woman, who looked to be in her late 20s (her husband, a builder, appeared to be in his thirties), was already five months pregnant. The other woman, who is about 30, is not yet pregnant, but plans on getting knocked up and coming over next year. Her husband has a decent government job as a painter, also does “PJs” (private jobs), and built his wife a house.

(The country is officially named, “The Republic of Trinidad & Tobago,” after the two islands which it is composed of, off Venezuela’s northeastern coast, and also called “TT” and “T&T,” for short. We never go to Tobago, which is a tourist trap—even when white tourists aren’t being raped or butchered out of purely racial motives—and follow the Trinidadian practice of speaking of the country as “Trinidad.” The government created the barbarism, “Trinbagonian,” but no real people use it. Although TT has a national government, relatively wealthy, sparsely populated Tobago enjoys its own, semi-autonomous government. As of last month, TT’s population was estimated at 1,229,953.)

I wrote, “even in Trinidad,” because few people there have Internet service. But they have cellphones, and a great many TTers talk to relatives and friends who have already moved, by hook or by crook, to the States.

Since TT has socialized health care, it has no public health care. In the public hospitals, the staff steals most of the supplies, including crucial medicine like antibiotics, so you have to bring everything your loved one might need.

If you take ill and want to live, you must ante up for a private “nursing home” (read: clinic) or private hospital, where you have to pay cash up front, or they let you die. And “cash” means just that. No plastic, no checks.

While we were visiting, a beloved sister-in-law of mine, who had just had her gall bladder removed, almost died of a bile duct obstruction that her doctors had missed the first time around. At one point, my sister-in-law needed to be moved from a private nursing home to a private hospital, for the bile duct procedure. But it was 5:30 p.m. by the time the doctor scheduled her 9 p.m. procedure, hours after the banks had closed, and so, when the ambulance (an independent, private service) brought her from the nursing home to the hospital, and her husband didn’t have the necessary $5000 TT cash for the procedure, the hospital staff refused to admit her. So, the driver took her back to the nursing home, only when he brought her back to her room, he demanded $1,800 TT, not the $1,200 he had agreed to in advance. Unfortunately, I wasn’t there at the time, and he was able to bully L’s daughter-in-law into paying the $1,800. (Which was a complete waste.)

For an alternative description of TT’s public health system, in the entry in The Pretend Encyclopedia, aka Wikipedia, one reads,

Public Healthcare is free to everyone in Trinidad and Tobago and is paid for by the Government and taxpayers. Healthcare services are offered on a walk-in basis. There are a few major hospitals throughout the country as well as smaller health centers and clinics located regionally throughout.

The Ministry of Health is mandated to provide a functioning health-care system to benefit all citizens. This had led to the reforming of the entire health-care system in the country.


In addition to TT’s relative poverty, its health care system, or lack thereof, makes America doubtless terribly attractive to TT women. But that’s not America’s problem. For approximately 5.5 billion people, health care is as bad or worse than it is in TT. And if Trinidadians know about the anchor baby scam, the whole world does.

(The exchange rate has for years fluctuated from $6.20-6.30 TT to $1 US, with TT banks giving you an even $6 TT, but that rate means nothing to locals who earn their money in TT dollars.

The CIA World Factbook ranks TT 112th in world purchase power parity, between Botswana and Senegal. Affluent North Korea ranks above it at 95th, with Tokelau last at 228. The U.S. is ranked a very close second overall, due to the expedient of misrepresenting the European Union as one country.)

Am I Guilty of Turning Criminal Alien Invaders into “Bogeyman”?

By Nicholas Stix

A blog poster has charged me with insufficient kindness towards, and a lack of collaboration with the criminal alien army of invasion and occupation.
My Oak Park, IL writer friend Jim Bowman posted a blog entitled, “Belated sighting of elephant in room”.

Now and then an obvious truth is restated:

“The budget shortfall for 2010 would mark the second straight year of trillion-dollar deficits. Along with the unemployment numbers, the deficit may complicate President Barack Obama’s drive for his top domestic priority, overhauling the U.S. health care system.

“‘It throws a wrench in health-care reforms,’ Maya MacGuineas, president of the bipartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, said in an interview. ‘No matter the specific numbers, they’re a constant reminder that we’re in bad, bad shape.’”

And a Republican goes further:

“‘If anyone had any doubts that this burden on future generations is unsustainable, they’re gone,’ said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, adding that economic stimulus funds should be diverted to pay down U.S. debt.”
Oh that golden stimulus, oh that golden stimulus. Liquidate that!

I responded as follows.

“Along with the unemployment numbers, the deficit may complicate President Barack Obama’s drive for his top domestic priority, overhauling the U.S. health care system.”

People act as though “Obama’s” various plans were mutually contradictory, but they aren’t. Obamacare is designed to: 1. Push the older whites who paid into the Medicare system out of government health care, on behalf of legal and illegal immigrants; and 2. Together with O’s other plans, and onerous taxes and inflation, wipe out whatever hard-earned wealth the white working and middle classes have managed to accrue, so as to “equalize wealth.” (He’ll use rich whites until he no longer needs them.)

Meanwhile, “Obama” plans to amnesty and naturalize all illegals presently here, and invite and airlift in tens of millions others, in order to disenfranchise all whites, so that the latter cannot do anything politically or otherwise to defend themselves against his predations, and those of his supporters.

As he said earlier this year, he must enact all parts of his agenda, and must do so immediately. The reason, which he did not give, was so that his intended victims would have no time to effectively rally forces against him.

A reader named John Powers wrote the following reply, which he thought put me in my place.


Wouldn’t taxes and inflation also effect immigrants? I think you (Stix) should find another bogeyman.
JBP


To which I responded:

What taxes do most “immigrants” pay? (When their defenders, like John, use the term, it is as a euphemism for illegal aliens.) I can't say zero, because most pay negative taxes. Millions of illegals also defraud the taxpayers out of billions of dollars each year in Earned Income Tax Credits.

In California, every illegal immigrant eats up $8-12 in services for every dollar he pays in services. Legal immigrants also eat up more in services than they pay in taxes. And no “service” today is more expensive—for white American citizen-taxpayers, that is—than health care.

John claims that inflation would also “effect [sic] immigrants [sic].”

You know what, John, I hadn’t thought of that. Lessee.

Inflation would eat up tens of thousands of dollars in home equity that the average illegal immigrant adult has spent decades building up.

Inflation would eat up tens of thousands of dollars in savings that the average illegal immigrant has spent decades building up.

Inflation would eat up hundreds of thousands of dollars in retirement accounts and annuities that the average illegal immigrant has spent decades building up… in a Bizarro World, alternate universe!

What do you have against white Americans, John?

“Reparations by Way of Health Care Reform”

“AP: California Faces Imminent Insolvency: Immigration Not a Factor”

“The EITC and Illegal Immigration”

That was the last I heard from John Powers. After all, it took him only a few seconds to toss off his morally superior remark, while it took me some time to formulate a sarcastic argument, edit it, and dig up supporting citations, and anti-American types like him aren’t much for facts, logic, or principles. He’s likely long since moved on to other right-of-center blogs, where he left his drive-by remark.

For the record, I consider the invaders’ American collaborators just as bad as they are, and equally worthy of harsh punishment.

Tuesday, September 01, 2009

An Answer to Pat Buchanan’s Question, “70 Years After—Did Hitler Really Want War?”

By Nicholas Stix

Yes!

Letalvis Cobbins’ Knoxville Horror Murder Trial, “Barack Obama,” and Jim Snow

By Nicholas Stix

In “This guy didn't get the death penalty?,” some of my readers at Slate--no, I’m not being sarcastic, they put up with a lot of crap from the resident racial socialists—were discussing Knoxville Horror killer Letalvis Cobbins’ punishment, or lack thereof, for carjacking, kidnapping, raping, torturing and murdering Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom, when “ranger” segued to the matter of the Führer and his Brownshirts. (I added the links.)


Re: This guy didn't get the death penalty?
by el cid
08/29/2009, 12:20 AM #
Reply

11 — ranger wrote at 7:31 PM on August 27:

With 6 blacks on the jury and what probably amounts to whites who wanted to show how kind they were did anybody expect this thug to get the death penalty? I know there are those who say that life in prison is worse than death, but not to an imbecillic black, who can be entertained by shadows flitting across the wall.

And speaking of black thugs, Glenn Beck came right out on his show this evening, saying he thinks the “civilian army” Obama is raising, that will be funded and as strong as the US military, (In Obama’s own words.) is going to amount to black thugs like the Black Panthers who were carrying a stick at a polling place, telling white voters they were there to assure that a black man gets elected. Obviously he’s right, because they refused to charge them with intimidation or to even pursue civil charges. They have shown us they have no intention of prosecuting their own “defense corps.”

Other thugs, mostly black, would be Acorn and the SEIU union.

Beck laid out a VERY convincing argument, and there’s no doubt in my mind he’s right. He had on plenty of high profile people to back up his opinion also.

And why is this army being raised? According to Beck, to fight the same people who they have been demonizing as right wing extremists: The tea party crowd, those who believe in traditional American values, the type of citizens at town hall meetings, the type of people now organizing in self defense. In other words, all of us who don’t have our minds “right.”

The black professor, Carol Swain, who wrote recently that Obama has made race relations worse not better, and added she fears serious racial conflict, and Jon Voight, who asked if Obama is going to start a civil war, are both right, in my opinion.

In my estimation we’re in the most dangerous period in our history, because we’re on the brink of breakup right now. Now, more than ever, I would advise people to prepare for hard times, and their own defense and sustenance.