Larry Auster calls modern liberal society “a factory for producing young female murder victims.” I believe Auster was referring to white female murder victims, or at least, I would make that qualification.
Last July, I wrote the blog essay reprinted below (“Assailant Gets 422 Years for Attack on Raceless Victim”) on some of the crimes of racist, persistent felony offender Robert “Pooh” Williams. Blogger Nivius Vir, however, just found and posted a powerful AP video on the story, “Sadistic Attack, Torture and Rape Revisited,” including compelling trial testimony by the victim, who through great pluck, just barely survived her ordeal. The video tells, which the stories I read about the case in the New York papers did not, that Williams raped the victim anally, and sodomized her (orally) “until she vomited.”
The case sounds ever more like a replay of the Knoxville Horror, from three months earlier. But Robert Williams wasn’t necessarily imitating the horrors committed against Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom; he may not even have heard of that particular crime. Rather, ever increasing numbers of black boys and men aspire to rape white females in every orifice, torture them, and murder them. But it wasn’t racial; it never is.
Investigators and prosecutors are careful, in such cases, never to ask any questions regarding what the assailant said to the victim which might elicit forbidden responses, like say, “He said, ‘You white bitch!’”
Note that AP’s honchos insisted on assigning exclusively “persons of color” to cover this black-on-white racial attack. I guess that means we’ll be seeing all-white crews and commentators for AP video stories claiming blacks’ victimization by whites.
Anthony Kirkland
Nivius Vir posts a great deal on black-on-white crime, typically including videos, and it is at his blog that I learned of the murder—and though the first several news stories said nothing about it, likely rape—of 13-year-old Ohio girl, Esme Kenney. (I can’t recall the last case of a savage murder of a white female by a black man that did not involve rape, as well. Note too the history of the suspect in this case.)
Convicted murderer and sex criminal Anthony Kirkland, 40, has been charged in Esme’s murder, and on Tuesday was charged with two additional 2006 murders, of Casonya Crawford, 14, and Mary Jo Newton, 45, as well as attempted rape and “gross abuse of a corpse,” in the case of Esme Kenney.
Victims and witnesses have also charged Kirkland with a spree of additional violent felonies, but he has not been indicted in those cases, and since he is already facing the death penalty for the Crawford, Newton, and Kenney murders, he will likely never be formally charged for his other alleged crimes.
Assailant Gets 422 Years for Attack on Raceless Victim
By Nicholas Stix
July 27, 2008
VDARE.com
Robert Williams, convicted on “44 counts of attempted murder, kidnapping, arson, rape, sodomy and burglary” for his 19-hour reign of terror against a then-23-year-old Columbia University student, was sentenced on Thursday to 422 years in prison. Under New York State law, Williams will be eligible for parole after serving 50 years.
Justice Carol Berkman called Williams’ acts “extraordinary evil.” The Daily News reported,
Williams had gained access to the victim’s apartment building near Columbia’s campus, taken the elevator with her, followed her down the hall, and forced his way into her apartment. The victim was then a graduate student at the nation’s most influential journalism school—run by racial propagandist Nicholas Lemann—which trains aspiring writers to refrain from reporting honestly on race and crime.“The remorseless rapist, who had to be forcibly dragged into court, showed no emotion, sitting shackled at the defense table, his hands draped in protective mitts to prevent him from scratching anyone.”
“Monster gets 422 years for 19-hour rape and torture of Columbia student,” by Barbara Ross and Bill Hutchinson, July 25.
In a crime with echoes to the Knoxville Horror, Williams repeatedly raped the victim, repeatedly orally and anally sodomized her, poured bleach in her eyes, boiling water on her body, cut up her face with a carving knife, and slit her eyelids. At the end, he pumped her full of pills to make her helpless, tied her to her futon, and before leaving, set the bed on fire, in order to kill her. Using the fire to free herself from the bed, the victim heroically escaped, her hands still bound.
The victim, who did not attend Williams’ sentencing, wrote a letter to the judge, asking for the max. The victim had testified for two days during the June trial, days on which Williams refused to attend his own trial. I suspect that he sought to make it impossible for his victim to identify him in open court as her tormentor.
Justice Berkman praised the victim, “Every decent person who witnessed [her] testimony in this courtroom was impressed by her bravery, her intelligence and her extraordinary grace in the face of the horror that this defendant inflicted upon her.”
When Williams was still at large, he was identified by the Daily News as “black,” but his victim’s race was never mentioned. At the time, NYPD spokesman, Detective Dennis Laffin, informed me that the victim was white. I left a message on Daily News Metro Editor Dean Chang’s answering machine, asking him why the newspaper failed to mention the victim’s race, but Chang never responded.
Race politics also clouded the News’ coverage of the trial. While understandably blotting out her face, the News’ court artist [Jane Rosenberg] depicted the testifying victim as having light brown skin, suggesting she was not white. In the same story, reporter Barbara Ross may have sought to counteract the paper’s censorship/deception, by referring to the victim’s “pale face.”
12 comments:
Interesting video. Toward the end, when the defense attorney decided not to cross-examine the witness, it sounded as if he himself was completely convinced of his clients guilt.
The Larry Auster quote, “a factory for producing young female murder victims.” is brilliantly accurate.
I found this paragraph very interesting:
"Investigators and prosecutors are careful, in such cases, never to ask any questions regarding what the assailant said to the victim which might elicit forbidden responses, like say, “He said, ‘You white bitch!’”
Law, and political correctness are such a tightrope act. Practitioners of political correctness seem ever aware of the perceived boundaries, training their tongues to yield at the presents of honesty.
I have to correct a misspelled word.
It is presence not presents. Sorry, caught it too late.
Dennis,
Yeah. He had a thankless task. How do you put together a defense of a monster like that? And yet, you can't just phone it in, because that would be grounds for reversible error on appeal, as ineffective assistance of counsel.
Nivius,
Auster is often that way.
As for the strategies of investigators and prosecutors, it was Stephen Webster's classic AmRen article on the Wichita Massacre that alerted me to that practice.
http://www.amren.com/
ar/2002/08/
"Although the perpetrators are black and all their victims white, the Wichita police have dismissed race as a motive. Prosecutor Foulston says the Carr brothers chose their victims at random, not because they were white, and that the motive was robbery. 'It reasonably appears that these were isolated incidents where individuals …were chosen at random … a random act of violence,' she says. 'The fact that the defendants and victims happen to be of different races has no bearing. Let’s just look at the underlying crimes.' The Wichita media consistently downplayed the racial angle.
"However, as news of the crimes spread across the Internet, many people began to wonder if the Carrs would be charged with hate crimes. In fact, it does not appear that Mrs. Foulston or police investigators even looked for a possible racial motive. According to the testimony of the April 2001 preliminary hearing, in which prosecutors determined whether they had enough evidence to support charges, Mrs. Foulston never asked H.G. or Andrew Schreiber if the brothers used racial slurs, or expressed hatred of whites."
"Investigators and prosecutors are careful, in such cases, never to ask any questions regarding what the assailant said to the victim which might elicit forbidden responses, like say, “He said, ‘You white bitch!’” (NiviusVir)
Great point, but there's no rational explanation for prosecutors doing this...and IF it were up to the individual prosecutors, you'd expect some differences between localities, but there really is none - Knoxville and NYC are on the same page, in that regard.
So where's that coming from?
Where's the OVERALL direction coming from, the Fed?
And WHY?
What's amazing is that EVERY administration, Democrat or Republican has been on the same page on this.
What difference would it make to the Criminal Justice system IF the vast majority of the black-on-white crimes were prosecuted as the "hate crimes" they obviously are?
None of this makes any sense, but as the Wichita Massacre (which Nicholas brings up) highlights, it's the SAME all over and it's the same no matter how egregious, or how OBVIOUS the racial motive for a black-on-white crime might be.
Nicholas Stix wrote:
"Larry Auster calls modern liberal society 'a factory for producing young female murder victims.' I believe Auster was referring to white female murder victims, or at least, I would make that qualification."
Yes, thank you. Of course you're right that I was thinking primarily of white femaless.
It occurs to me that one could construct an entire paradigm of modern society around this idea, by looking at all the components in the production process.
To Larry Auster:
Thanks for the clarification.
This is yet another of the many blessings of the civil rights movement.
I was initially inclined to ascribe much of the blame to feminism, before recalling that feminism is merely one of Martin’s many bastards.
With that said, the feminist angle works, I believe in the following way:
(White) feminists see themselves as having some sort of pact with blacks, whereby the feminists wage war on white, heterosexual males of all ages, and unquestioningly defend black racists, in exchange for the latter’s support.
Unfortunately, black racists laugh at the feminists, whom they occasionally throw a bone, but more often publicly betray and humiliate (see Central Park Jogger Case, OJ verdict, etc.).
This is analogous to the situation in which a “liberal” finds herself being mugged by a black man. She thinks that there is some sort of unwritten agreement, whereby not resisting “obliges” the mugger not to harm her. But his thought pattern is: ‘You not resisting, because you my slave. And because you my slave, I can and will do anything I want with you—rape you, beat you, torture you, kill you, and then throw you away.’
Cowardice is a big part of the feminist mentality (feminist morality?): Feminists are so vicious towards white, heterosexual men, not in response to the “patriarchal oppression” for which they vilify the men, but because the men are guilty of nothing of the sort. Meanwhile, feminists are so pleasant and polite towards menacing-looking black males, not because they see them as “the oppressed,” but rather because they are frightened to death of them. If there is one group that can be identified as oppressing white females more than any other (with the possible exception of feminist leaders), it is black males.
As I look back on the Preserving Western Civilization conference, and consider as well VDARE and American Renaissance, feminism is the problem that has been either ignored or barely touched upon. Perhaps dealing with it would overload a lot of people’s circuits, but as a matter of history and political science, it simply cannot be ignored.
Communism has triumphed in America through two main avenues: The civil rights movement and feminism. I’ll have more to say on this at a later date.
A friend recently sent me the short book Karla Marx, which critiques feminism. A quick browse looks promising. The author isn’t much of a threat to my old logic teacher, Michael Levin (but don’t hold that against him), whose tome Feminism and Freedom is the most thorough intellectual carpet bombing of that movement I’ve yet to see, but he’s gleaned some valuable criticisms from the literature.
BTW, the trial in the Jennifer Moore case is expected to take place “in late spring or early fall”; with the criminal justice system, it’s always best to bet on later, rather than sooner.
http://www.northjersey.
com/news/northernnj/
newstracker012609.html
"Investigators and prosecutors are careful, in such cases, never to ask any questions regarding what the assailant said to the victim which might elicit forbidden responses, like say, “He said, ‘You white bitch!’”
Joe: Great point, but there's no rational explanation for prosecutors doing this...and IF it were up to the individual prosecutors, you'd expect some differences between localities, but there really is none - Knoxville and NYC are on the same page, in that regard.
So where's that coming from?
Where's the OVERALL direction coming from, the Fed?
NS: Here’s the way I explain it. AA + diversity training + Karl Marxist U. = Frightened white people in all major institutions, nationwide.
JFK paid lip service to affirmative action, but he never foresaw a system of quotas. Bizarro world history notwithstanding, Jack Kennedy was no lefty.
LBJ was the father of AA, with the 1964 Civil Rights Act and Executive Order 11246.
http://www.eeoc.gov/
abouteeoc/35th/thelaw/
eo-11246.html
Soon after passage of the Civil Rights Act, a Justice Department official named Alfred Blumrosen perverted it, making it into a recipe for racial quotas. But that was bound to happen with such an unconstitutional law.
Blacks showed Johnson their gratitude for the Civil Rights Act by burning down cities all over America. The more they rioted, the more he did for them, and the more he did for them, the more they rioted.
The quota system really took off under Nixon, who responded to the race riots by seeking to buy peace, by ensuring that millions of unqualified blacks would displace millions of qualified whites in the workplace, universities, and in public contracting.
The unqualified blacks showed Nixon their gratitude by launching frivolous lawsuits against public and private employers alike (and by engaging in a vioent black-on-white crime wave, including nationwide mass murder, but that's a story for another time).
The employers somehow got the idea (perhaps from the unqualified black employees or their white allies or the diversity trainers themselves) that if they hired racist diversity trainers to harass their white workers, the lawsuits would go away. Instead, the diversity trainers encouraged the incompetent, racist black employees to file ever more frivolous lawsuits, which were supported by racist extortionists such as Jesse Jackson Sr. (Texaco, Coca-Cola, Toyota, etc.).
In order to avoid lawsuits, more and more workplaces imposed ever more draconian restrictions on the speech and conduct of "non-protected" classes.
Meanwhile, as the diversity economy gutted ever more forms of real industry, while creating and promoting ever more sectors in which “industry” was a metaphor or euphemism for scams exhausting or redistributing rather than creating wealth, an ever greater share of the population was forced by economic necessity to attend college. These colleges had been dominated for generations by communists and socialists, but under the diversity regime they became more powerful than before, reached a much larger proportion of the citizenry than ever before, and drove out as many non-leftists as possible, while creating a vast demimonde of non-teaching jobs (social workers for black and Hispanic AA admits, "Higher Education Officers" -- a job title which I cannot explain, but which sounds like Soviet commissars -- Division of Student Life, which Kors and Silverglate dubbed “The Shadow University,” etc.), all of which required an illegal political litmus test of loyalty to anti-American “multiculturalism,” “diversity” (racial socialism or neo-communism), etc., and which are often distributed based on AA, as well.
Beginning during the late 1970s, illegal and unconstitutional diversity training was eventually imposed on undergraduates in public and private colleges alike, as was political grading.
The departments which, in my opinion, did the worst damage were the graduate schools of teacher ed and journalism. They existed as gatekeepers to ensure that patriotism and excellence alike were kept out of the respective professions they governed. Newsrooms, for instance, are now governed by a coalition of anti-white blacks, and Hispanics, feminists and homosexuals. The blacks and Hispanics, in particular, act as newsroom enforcers, driving out honest, excellent journalists.
As for your specific topic, Joe, a prosecutor who confronts black racism would be denounced by the media and racist black activists as a “racist,” and be dumped by his cowardly boss, in an effort to appease the unappeasable. More likely, his boss (the DA) would never permit him to confront black racism, fearing that the media would then destroy him in the next election. In the Wichita Massacre trial, prosecutor Nola Foulston was the DA, so she simply censored herself.
Nicholas Stix,
I'm in complete agreement with you that feminism is an underacknowledged aspect of our present crisis. I'd love to see you write about this at some point.
I feel deeply for white women who've been sexually abused and murdered by these black night riders. It's the ultimate humiliation. Our mothers, sisters, daughters and wives, the lifeblood of our communities, deserve better. The answer seems to be for whites to come closer together as a people to better protect and defend our loved ones. I think that's starting to happen, on a small scale of course but it's still encouraging.
Post a Comment